Where TPM comes from
TPM was developed in Japan in the 1960s and 1970s, building on American preventive maintenance, and was formalised by Seiichi Nakajima and the Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance (JIPM). Its core idea is simple: equipment reliability is not just the maintenance department's job. The people who run the machine every shift are best placed to notice early signs of deterioration.
The eight pillars
Most TPM programmes are organised around eight pillars, built on a foundation of 5S:
- Autonomous maintenance – operators clean, inspect, lubricate and tighten their own equipment.
- Planned maintenance – scheduled work based on failure history and condition.
- Focused improvement – small cross-functional teams attack specific losses.
- Quality maintenance – setting equipment conditions that prevent defects.
- Early equipment management – designing in maintainability from lessons learned.
- Training and education – building operator and technician skills.
- Safety, health and environment – removing hazards from equipment and the workplace.
- TPM in administration – applying the same thinking to office and support processes.
The six big losses and OEE
TPM targets six big losses: breakdowns, set-up and adjustment, small stops, reduced speed, start-up rejects and production rejects. OEE combines availability, performance and quality into one figure so teams can see which losses matter most on each asset.
How to start
- Pick a model machine or line that matters to the business.
- Measure its losses honestly, including small stops that are rarely recorded.
- Run initial cleaning with operators and maintenance together, tagging every abnormality found.
- Set cleaning, inspection and lubrication standards and schedule the planned work.
- Review losses daily in tier meetings and escalate what the team cannot fix.
- Spread the approach only once the model area is stable.
Common mistakes
- Treating TPM as a maintenance-department initiative rather than a shared operating discipline.
- Chasing an OEE number without understanding the losses behind it.
- Running cleaning blitzes without standards, so equipment drifts back.
- Tagging abnormalities faster than anyone closes them, which quickly kills operator engagement.